Contact us
Our team would love to hear from you.
Entering new regulated markets introduces new expectations for a margin trading platform, especially around security, delivery, and compliance. We conducted an architecture review to determine whether the current architecture, engineering practices, and security governance are expansion-ready and what must change to meet regional requirements.
A company operating a cloud-based margin trading platform planned to enter new regulated markets. This introduced region-specific regulatory, operational, and technical requirements. Any gaps could delay launch, trigger rework, or create security and compliance risks.
EffectiveSoft initiated an architecture review to evaluate the platform’s current state, identify surface risks, and determine how to improve the product, processes, and team structure to support regional scaling.
Financial services provider
Architecture assessmeent
Senior Solution Architect and Senior Software Engineer
We conducted an end-to-end assessment, covering both technical and organizational aspects, including:
Over three months, our review experts ran around 60 structured sessions with representatives from almost every project team. Each session was built around team-specific questions, with overlap where teams collaborate or share workflows. This approach enabled us to see how work actually moves through the organization, compare perspectives on the same processes, and identify gaps that slow delivery or increase risk.
As architecture documentation was largely missing, we reconstructed a high-level solution diagram and mapped key data flows based on input from the development teams. In parallel, we reviewed the back-end and web codebases to understand how the platform is structured and how key parts of the system work internally.
Our review showed that the platform has a strong baseline for multi-region growth. Core strengths include:
The review also revealed several improvement opportunities. We evaluated each finding for its potential business and regulatory impact, focusing on risks that could slow expansion or increase security and compliance risks.
Most findings related to maturity areas critical for regulated market entry: secure delivery governance, release predictability, architecture clarity and dependency control, operational readiness for multi-region scale, and policy-driven use of AI tools in engineering workflows.
To prevent these gaps from becoming obstacles to scaling, we provided sequenced, step-by-step recommendations specifying what to address first, what can be improved in parallel, and what must be in place before the platform enters new markets.
We compiled the results into a multipurpose Architecture Review Document (ARD) designed for executives, management, and tech and team leads. Organized by review domains, the ARD covers each area in a dedicated section, combining a high-level overview of key risks and priorities with detailed observations for deeper analysis.
Supporting artifacts included additional documents with detailed analysis for specific review areas, including code review, encrypted sensitive findings, and a dependency matrix.
The review gives the client a clear foundation to expand the solution for new requirements while steadily improving platform maturity. From there, the recommendations can be converted into a clear implementation road map with defined ownership, timelines, and measurable outcomes.
Our team would love to hear from you.
Fill out the form, and we’ve got you covered.
What happens next?
San Diego, California
4445 Eastgate Mall, Suite 200
92121, 1-800-288-9659
San Francisco, California
50 California St #1500
94111, 1-800-288-9659
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
One Oxford Centre, 500 Grant St Suite 2900
15219, 1-800-288-9659
Durham, North Carolina
RTP Meridian, 2530 Meridian Pkwy Suite 300
27713, 1-800-288-9659
San Jose, Costa Rica
C. 118B, Trejos Montealegre
10203, 1-800-288-9659